Buckley Institute hosts a debate on the power of the President over the Executive Branch

Firing Line Debate: The Executive Branch Belongs to the President

Two leading constitutional scholars will debate the resolved, "The Executive Branch Belongs to the President."

Date & Time
February 26, 2026, 4:30 pm
Location
WLH 207
100 Wall St
New Haven, CT
Details
On Thursday, February 26, 2026, at 4:30 pm, the Buckley Institute will welcome Yale Law School’s Bruce Ackerman and University of St. Thomas School of Law’s Michael Paulsen for a Firing Line debate on the resolved, “The Executive Branch Belongs to the President.”

When the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia dissented in Morrison v. Olson in 1988, he argued that the Constitution places all executive power in the hands of the president, asserting that the executive functions of government must remain in control of the president or his appointees. Scalia’s dissent fits into a long-running debate over the power of the president of the United States and whether and how government agencies and officials can operate outside of the authority of the elected leader of the executive branch. President Trump’s attacks on the “deep state” have brought the debate to the front of national attention, raising questions about whether government officials can contravene the will of the President to whom they ultimately report. 

Do all executive functions of the government need to be answerable, through chain of command, to the president? Do legislative or judicial checks authorize those branches to take over executive branch functions? What do the Constitution and historical precedent tell us about the role of political authority in directing the actions of government officials?

Location to be determined. This event is free and open to the public. 

___

Bruce Ackerman is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of nineteen books in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. He is a Commander of the French Order of Merit, a member of the American Law Institute and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. The American Philosophical Society has awarded him the Henry Phillips Prize for lifetime achievement in Jurisprudence, especially noting his exploration of the great turning points in American constitutional history in his three volume series, We the People. His award-winning early work, Social Justice in the Liberal State, continues to provoke contemporary controversy.

His scholarship has had a global impact. He has been named a Leading Global Thinker by Foreign Policy magazine, and has been awarded an Honorary Doctorate from the University of Trieste, Italy, for his contributions to comparative constitutional law. Before the Next Attack (2006) served as a basis for the reform of the French constitution dealing with emergency powers. The Stakeholder Society (with Anne Alstott) has served as the basis for reform initiatives in Brazil, Britain, and elsewhere that guarantee every person a fair share of the nation’s wealth by providing them with a “citizen stake” consisting of a substantial cash grant as they reach maturity.

His recent book, Revolutionary Constitutions (Harvard: 2019) puts the worldwide constitutional crisis in historical perspective by comparing the postwar experience of countries as different as France, India, Iran, Italy, Israel, Poland, South Africa, and the United States — and suggests that these nations have a good deal to learn from one another in confronting the current assault on checks-and-balances. His arguments have generated a world-ranging discussion, provoking the publication of four Symposium volumes in which leading academics and jurists from around the world have greatly enriched comparative constitutional understanding. For the relevant volumes, see the curriculum vitae.

More recently, he has published The Postmodern Predicament (Yale: 2024), dealing with the fundamental ways the internet revolution is transforming the struggle for a meaningful life — from the very first moment that a youngster picks up his first cellphone. Ackerman argues that 20th-century existentialists, like Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre, offer crucial insights into the shattering challenges of the internet age — and follows their lead in proposing a series of decisive reforms that promise to reduce — if not eliminate -- the clear and present danger to constitutional democracy in the postmodern world.

Michael Paulsen received his B.A. degree with distinction from Northwestern University, where he was a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He received an M.A. degree in Religion from Yale Divinity School and a J.D. degree from Yale Law School, where he was an editor of the Yale Law Journal and a recipient of the Harlan Fiske Stone Prize for appellate advocacy. After graduation from law school, he joined the Department of Justice in the Criminal Division Honors Program, and has also served as staff counsel for the Center for Law & Religious Freedom in Washington, D.C. and as an attorney-advisor in the Office of Legal Counsel.

Prior to coming to the University of St. Thomas School of Law, Paulsen served as the McKnight Presidential Professor of Law and Public Policy, Briggs and Morgan Professor of Law, and Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship at the University of Minnesota Law School.

Professor Paulsen is among the nation’s leading scholars of constitutional interpretation, and his publications include articles in the Yale Law Journal, Stanford Law Review, Chicago Law Review, NYU Law Review, Texas Law Review, California Law Review, and the Georgetown Law Journal, among many others

Other Past Firing Line Debates

Firing Line Debate: Global Order Needs U.S. Power

On Thursday, September 25, at 4:30pm, the Buckley Institute hosted the first Firing Line Debate of the semester on the resolved “Global Order Needs U.S. Power.”

Firing Line Debate: America's Ruling Class Has Failed

On Tuesday, April 1, the Buckley Institute hosted a debate over whether or not America's ruling class has failed, featuring Newsweek's Josh Hammer and Yale's Gregory Huber.

Firing Line Debate: Should the Law Only Recognize Biological Sex?

On March 26 at 4:30pm, the Buckley Institute is hosting a Firing Line debate on whether the law should only recognize biological sex.